S 683 - Emporiae, bronze, tritartemorion, 218-195 BC

From SILVER
SILVER IDUnique ID of the page ᵖ: 8752


218 BCE - 195 BCE Bronze

Description
ObverseInscription or printing placed on the obverse.:
ReverseInscription or printing placed on the reverse.:
Mint and issuing power
MintIdentifies the place of manufacture or issue of a numismatic object.: Emporiae Ancient regionAncient region.: Hispania Citerior Modern countryModern country: Spain AuthorityIdentifies the issuing power. The authority can be "pretended" when the name or the portrait of X is on the coin but he/she was not the issuing power. It can also be "uncertain" when there is no mention of X on the coin but he/she was the issuing power according to the historical sources: Roman Republic
Chronology
FromIdentifies the initial date in a range assigned in a numismatic context. 218 BCE toIdentifies the final date in a range assigned in a numismatic context.. 195 BCE PeriodTime period of the numismatic object.: Hellenistic 323-30 BC Nomisma.org
Physical description
MetalThe physical material (usually metal) from which an object is made.: Bronze Nomisma.org Median weightMedian of the weights of numismatic objects (in grams). in grams 0.45 DenominationTerm indicating the value of a numismatic object. Examples: tetradrachm, chalkous, denarius.: tritartemorion Nomisma.org StandardStandard.:
References
Die study referencePublication of the study: "[[Die study reference" contains a listed "[" character as part of the property label and has therefore been classified as invalid.]]1Villaronga 2003, n° 701-785.
Coin series referenceReference to coin series study:



Obverse dies distribution
FrequencyFrequency of specimen in distribution. ᵖ Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) % (o) Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) % (n) Die nameName(s) of the die(s).
1 50 81.97 50 58.82
2 5 8.2 10 11.76
3 3 4.92 9 10.59
4 1 1.64 4 4.71
5 1 1.64 5 5.88
7 1 1.64 7 8.24
Total 61 of 61 100.01 85 of 85 100
Reverse dies distribution

no distribution is available

Quantification
Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) 61 Number of singletons (o1)The number of singleton coins. ᵖ 50
Number of reverse diesNumber of reverse dies. (r) NC"NC" is not a number. Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) 85
Coins per obverse dieNumber of coins per obverse die. (n/o) 1.39 Coins per reverse dieNumber of coins per reverse die. (n/r)
Reverse per obverse ratioRatio of obverse dies divided by reverse dies. (r/o) Percentage of singletons (o1)number of coins (n) divided by the number of singletons (o1) ᵖ 81.97 %
Original number of dies (O) (Carter 1983 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to Carter 1983 ᵖ 171.84 Coins struck if 20,000 as average productivity per dieCoins made if the average productivity for obverses (according to Carter) is 20,000. ᵖ 3,436,800
Original number of dies (O) (Esty 2011 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to the singleton formula in Esty 2011 ᵖ (O) 216.04 Survival rate if 20,000 as average productivity per dieSurvival rate if average productivity is 20,000. ᵖ 0.00002
Coverage (o = % of O) (Esty 1984 formula)Esty 1984 - coverage (% of O) ᵖ (o = % of O) 41.18% Die productivity if survival rate 1/2,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/2,000. ᵖ 989.29
Weight of silver (in kg) if 20,000 coins per die (O = Carter formula)Carter 1983 * Median weight * 20000 (*10 if gold or electrum) ᵖ n.a. Die productivity if survival rate 1/5,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/5,000. ᵖ 2,473.23
Remarks


References

  1. ^  Villaronga, Leandre (2003), La plata emporitana de la segona guerra punica, final del segle III aC, Barcelona, 199 p. (72 pl.)