Thyateira, bronze (8g) (Apollo/tripod) (200-100 BCE)

From SILVER
SILVER IDUnique ID of the page ᵖ: 31829


200 BCE - 100 BCE Bronze

Description
ObverseInscription or printing placed on the obverse.: Head of Apollo wearing a laurel wreath
ReverseInscription or printing placed on the reverse.: ΘΥΑΤΕΙΡΗΝΩΝ (Greek).Tripod in laurel wreath
Mint and issuing power
MintIdentifies the place of manufacture or issue of a numismatic object.: Thyateira Ancient regionAncient region.: Lydia Modern countryModern country: Turkey AuthorityIdentifies the issuing power. The authority can be "pretended" when the name or the portrait of X is on the coin but he/she was not the issuing power. It can also be "uncertain" when there is no mention of X on the coin but he/she was the issuing power according to the historical sources:
Chronology
FromIdentifies the initial date in a range assigned in a numismatic context. 200 BCE toIdentifies the final date in a range assigned in a numismatic context.. 100 BCE PeriodTime period of the numismatic object.: Hellenistic 323-30 BC Nomisma.org
Physical description
MetalThe physical material (usually metal) from which an object is made.: Bronze Nomisma.org Median weightMedian of the weights of numismatic objects (in grams). in grams 8.50 DenominationTerm indicating the value of a numismatic object. Examples: tetradrachm, chalkous, denarius.: StandardStandard.:
Image
]]Thyateira_Apollo_tripod.jpg [1]
References
Die study referencePublication of the study: "[[Die study reference" contains a listed "[" character as part of the property label and has therefore been classified as invalid.]]1Hochard 2020, p. 458-460, series 2, group 1, n° 2360
Coin series referenceReference to coin series study:
Coin series web referenceCoin series web references:



Obverse dies distribution
FrequencyFrequency of specimen in distribution. ᵖ Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) % (o) Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) % (n) Die nameName(s) of the die(s).
1 2 66.67 2 20 7, 9
8 1 33.33 8 80 14
Total 3 of 3 100 10 of 10 100
Reverse dies distribution

no distribution is available

Quantification
Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) 3 Number of singletons (o1)The number of singleton coins. ᵖ 2
Number of reverse diesNumber of reverse dies. (r) 2 Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) 10
Coins per obverse dieNumber of coins per obverse die. (n/o) 3.33 Coins per reverse dieNumber of coins per reverse die. (n/r) 5
Reverse per obverse ratioRatio of obverse dies divided by reverse dies. (r/o) 0.67 Percentage of singletons (o1)number of coins (n) divided by the number of singletons (o1) ᵖ 66.67 %
Original number of dies (O) (Carter 1983 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to Carter 1983 ᵖ 3.68 Coins struck if 20,000 as average productivity per dieCoins made if the average productivity for obverses (according to Carter) is 20,000. ᵖ 73,600
Original number of dies (O) (Esty 2011 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to the singleton formula in Esty 2011 ᵖ (O) 4.29 Survival rate if 20,000 as average productivity per dieSurvival rate if average productivity is 20,000. ᵖ 0.00014
Coverage (o = % of O) (Esty 1984 formula)Esty 1984 - coverage (% of O) ᵖ (o = % of O) 80% Die productivity if survival rate 1/2,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/2,000. ᵖ 5,434.78
Weight of silver (in kg) if 20,000 coins per die (O = Carter formula)Carter 1983 * Median weight * 20000 (*10 if gold or electrum) ᵖ n.a. Die productivity if survival rate 1/5,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/5,000. ᵖ 13,586.96
Remarks

Most likely one single workstation

References

  1. ^  Hochard, Pierre-Olivier (2020), Lydie, terre d'empire(s): Etude de numismatique et d'histoire (228 a.C.-268 p.C.), 2 vol., Bordeaux, 2020, 1325 p.