Taras, gold, hemilitrai (1/20th staters) (Helios/thunderbolt) (333-330 BCE)

From SILVER
SILVER IDUnique ID of the page : 8804


333 BCE - 330 BCE Gold 86 kg

Description
ObverseInscription or printing placed on the obverse.: Radiate head of Helios facing slightly right
ReverseInscription or printing placed on the reverse.: TAPAN (Greek).TAPAN, thunderbolt, APOL below
Mint and issuing power
MintIdentifies the place of manufacture or issue of a numismatic object.: Taras Ancient regionAncient region.: Calabria Modern countryModern country: Italy AuthorityIdentifies the issuing power. The authority can be "pretended" when the name or the portrait of X is on the coin but he/she was not the issuing power. It can also be "uncertain" when there is no mention of X on the coin but he/she was the issuing power according to the historical sources:
Chronology
FromIdentifies the initial date in a range assigned in a numismatic context. 333 BCE toIdentifies the final date in a range assigned in a numismatic context.. 330 BCE PeriodTime period of the numismatic object.: Classical and Hellenistic
Physical description
MetalThe physical material (usually metal) from which an object is made.: Gold Nomisma.org Median weightMedian of the weights of numismatic objects (in grams). in grams 0.45 DenominationTerm indicating the value of a numismatic object. Examples: tetradrachm, chalkous, denarius.: hemilitra (1/20 stater) StandardStandard.:
Image
Taras_gold_helios.jpg [1]
References
Die study referencePublication of the study: Fischer-Bossert 19991Fischer-Bossert 1999, p. 349, G3.
Coin series referenceReference to coin series study: HN Italy2HN Italy, n° 906
Coin series web referenceCoin series web references:



Obverse dies distribution
FrequencyFrequency of specimen in distribution.  Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies.  (o) % (o) Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) % (n) Die nameName(s) of the die(s).
30 1 100 30 100 3
Total 1 of 1 100 30 of 30 100
Reverse dies distribution
FrequencyFrequency of specimen in distribution.  Number of reverse diesNumber of reverse dies. (r) % (r) Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) % (n) Die nameName(s) of the die(s).
30 1 100 30 100 3
Total 1 of 1 100 30 of 30 100


Quantification
Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies.  (o) 1 Number of singletons (o1)The number of singleton coins. 
Number of reverse diesNumber of reverse dies. (r) 1 Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) 30
Coins per obverse dieNumber of coins per obverse die. (n/o) 30 Coins per reverse dieNumber of coins per reverse die. (n/r) 30
Reverse per obverse ratioRatio of obverse dies divided by reverse dies. (r/o) 1 Percentage of singletons (o1)number of coins (n) divided by the number of singletons (o1)  %
Original number of dies (O) (Carter 1983 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to Carter 1983  0.96 Coins struck if 20,000 as average productivity per dieCoins made if the average productivity for obverses (according to Carter) is 20,000.  19,200
Original number of dies (O) (Esty 2011 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to the singleton formula in Esty 2011  (O) 1.03 Survival rate if 20,000 as average productivity per dieSurvival rate if average productivity is 20,000.  0.00156
Coverage (o = % of O) (Esty 1984 formula)Esty 1984 - coverage (% of O)  (o = % of O) % Die productivity if survival rate 1/2,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/2,000.  62,500
Weight of silver (in kg) if 20,000 coins per die (O = Carter formula)Carter 1983 * Median weight * 20000 (*10 if gold or electrum)  86 kg <br /> 86 kg Die productivity if survival rate 1/5,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/5,000.  156,250
Remarks

Most likely one single workstation

References

  1. ^  Fischer-Bossert, Wolfgang (1999), Chronologie der Didrachmenprägung von Tarent, 510-280 v. Chr., Berlin, De Gruyter, xvii, 495 p., [84] pl.
  2. ^  Rutter N. Keith et alii (eds.) (2001), Historia Numorum Italy, London, xvi, 223 p., 43 pl.