S 966 - Chersonesos, bronze, chalkous

From SILVER
SILVER IDUnique ID of the page ᵖ: 9125


350 BCE - 340 BCE Bronze

Description
ObverseInscription or printing placed on the obverse.: Dophin right. Border of dots.
ReverseInscription or printing placed on the reverse.: XEP (Greek).Club.
Mint and issuing power
MintIdentifies the place of manufacture or issue of a numismatic object.: Chersonesos Ancient regionAncient region.: Bosporus Modern countryModern country: Russia (Crimea) AuthorityIdentifies the issuing power. The authority can be "pretended" when the name or the portrait of X is on the coin but he/she was not the issuing power. It can also be "uncertain" when there is no mention of X on the coin but he/she was the issuing power according to the historical sources:
Chronology
FromIdentifies the initial date in a range assigned in a numismatic context. 350 BCE toIdentifies the final date in a range assigned in a numismatic context.. 340 BCE PeriodTime period of the numismatic object.: Classical 480-323 BC Nomisma.org
Physical description
MetalThe physical material (usually metal) from which an object is made.: Bronze Nomisma.org Median weightMedian of the weights of numismatic objects (in grams). in grams 0.70 DenominationTerm indicating the value of a numismatic object. Examples: tetradrachm, chalkous, denarius.: chalkous Nomisma.org StandardStandard.:
References
Die study referencePublication of the study: "[[Die study reference" contains a listed "[" character as part of the property label and has therefore been classified as invalid.]]1Kovalenko 2008, p. 134-136, n° 306-329.
Coin series referenceReference to coin series study:



Obverse dies distribution
FrequencyFrequency of specimen in distribution. ᵖ Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) % (o) Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) % (n) Die nameName(s) of the die(s).
1 13 76.47 13 44.83 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17
2 2 11.76 4 13.79 5, 7
3 1 5.88 3 10.34 13
5 1 5.88 5 17.24 3
Total 17 of 17 99.99 25 of 29 86.2
Reverse dies distribution

no distribution is available

Quantification
Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) 17 Number of singletons (o1)The number of singleton coins. ᵖ 13
Number of reverse diesNumber of reverse dies. (r) 11 Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) 29
Coins per obverse dieNumber of coins per obverse die. (n/o) 1.71 Coins per reverse dieNumber of coins per reverse die. (n/r) 2.64
Reverse per obverse ratioRatio of obverse dies divided by reverse dies. (r/o) 0.65 Percentage of singletons (o1)number of coins (n) divided by the number of singletons (o1) ᵖ 76.47 %
Original number of dies (O) (Carter 1983 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to Carter 1983 ᵖ 33.18 Coins struck if 20,000 as average productivity per dieCoins made if the average productivity for obverses (according to Carter) is 20,000. ᵖ 663,600
Original number of dies (O) (Esty 2011 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to the singleton formula in Esty 2011 ᵖ (O) 41.08 Survival rate if 20,000 as average productivity per dieSurvival rate if average productivity is 20,000. ᵖ 0.00004
Coverage (o = % of O) (Esty 1984 formula)Esty 1984 - coverage (% of O) ᵖ (o = % of O) 55.17% Die productivity if survival rate 1/2,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/2,000. ᵖ 1,748.04
Weight of silver (in kg) if 20,000 coins per die (O = Carter formula)Carter 1983 * Median weight * 20000 (*10 if gold or electrum) ᵖ n.a. Die productivity if survival rate 1/5,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/5,000. ᵖ 4,370.1
Remarks


References

  1. ^  Kovalenko, Sergei (2008), Die spätklassiche Münzprägung von Chersonesos Taurica, Berlin, 156 p., 18 pl.