S 837 - Tiberias, bronze, dupondius (1) (39-40 CE)
From SILVER
39 CE - 40 CE Bronze
Description
| ObverseInscription or printing placed on the obverse.: | ΓΑΙΩ ΚΑΙCAPI ΓEPMA NIKΩ (Greek). |
| ReverseInscription or printing placed on the reverse.: | HPΩΔHC TETPAPXHC (Greek). |
Mint and issuing power
| MintIdentifies the place of manufacture or issue of a numismatic object.: | Tiberias | Ancient regionAncient region.: | Galilee | Modern countryModern country: Israel | AuthorityIdentifies the issuing power. The authority can be "pretended" when the name or the portrait of X is on the coin but he/she was not the issuing power. It can also be "uncertain" when there is no mention of X on the coin but he/she was the issuing power according to the historical sources: | Caligula (Roman emperor, 37-41 AD), Herod Antipas (tetrarch of Galilee and Perea, 4 BC-39 AD), Germanicus (general of the Julio-Claudian dynasty, 15-19 AD) - pretended authority |
Chronology
| FromIdentifies the initial date in a range assigned in a numismatic context. | 39 CE | toIdentifies the final date in a range assigned in a numismatic context.. | 40 CE | PeriodTime period of the numismatic object.: Roman from 30 BC 
|
Physical description
| MetalThe physical material (usually metal) from which an object is made.: | Bronze
|
DenominationTerm indicating the value of a numismatic object. Examples: tetradrachm, chalkous, denarius.: | dupondius (1) | StandardStandard.: |
References
| Die study referencePublication of the study: | "[[Die study reference" contains a listed "[" character as part of the property label and has therefore been classified as invalid.]]1A. J. Kogon et Ph. Fontanille, The Coinage of Herod Antipas: A Study and Die Classification of the Earliest Coins of Galilee, Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity 102). Foreword by C. Lorber, Leiden-Boston, 2018 (série F, type n° 18, dénomination I). | ||
| Coin series referenceReference to coin series study: | |||
Obverse dies distribution
| FrequencyFrequency of specimen in distribution. ᵖ | Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) | % (o) | Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) | % (n) | Die nameName(s) of the die(s). |
| 1 | 3 | 23.08 | 3 | 6.25 | |
| 2 | 3 | 23.08 | 6 | 12.5 | |
| 3 | 2 | 15.38 | 6 | 12.5 | |
| 4 | 1 | 7.69 | 4 | 8.33 | |
| 5 | 1 | 7.69 | 5 | 10.42 | |
| 6 | 1 | 7.69 | 6 | 12.5 | |
| 8 | 1 | 7.69 | 8 | 16.67 | |
| 10 | 1 | 7.69 | 10 | 20.83 | |
| Total | 13 of 13 | 99.99 | 48 of 48 | 100 |
Reverse dies distribution
no distribution is available
Quantification
| Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) | 13 | Number of singletons (o1)The number of singleton coins. ᵖ | 3 |
| Number of reverse diesNumber of reverse dies. (r) | 14 | Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) | 48 |
| Coins per obverse dieNumber of coins per obverse die. (n/o) | 3.69 | Coins per reverse dieNumber of coins per reverse die. (n/r) | 3.43 |
| Reverse per obverse ratioRatio of obverse dies divided by reverse dies. (r/o) | 1.08 | Percentage of singletons (o1)number of coins (n) divided by the number of singletons (o1) ᵖ | 23.08 % |
| Original number of dies (O) (Carter 1983 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to Carter 1983 ᵖ | 15.46 | Coins struck if 20,000 as average productivity per dieCoins made if the average productivity for obverses (according to Carter) is 20,000. ᵖ | 309,200 |
| Original number of dies (O) (Esty 2011 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to the singleton formula in Esty 2011 ᵖ (O) | 17.83 | Survival rate if 20,000 as average productivity per dieSurvival rate if average productivity is 20,000. ᵖ | 0.00016 |
| Coverage (o = % of O) (Esty 1984 formula)Esty 1984 - coverage (% of O) ᵖ (o = % of O) | 93.75% | Die productivity if survival rate 1/2,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/2,000. ᵖ | 6,209.57 |
| Weight of silver (in kg) if 20,000 coins per die (O = Carter formula)Carter 1983 * Median weight * 20000 (*10 if gold or electrum) ᵖ | n.a. | Die productivity if survival rate 1/5,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/5,000. ᵖ | 15,523.93 |
Remarks
References
- ^ A. J. Kogon et Ph. Fontanille
