S 821 - Tiberias, bronze, dupondius (1) (20-21 CE)

From SILVER
SILVER IDUnique ID of the page ᵖ: 8792


20 CE - 21 CE Bronze

Description
ObverseInscription or printing placed on the obverse.: TIBEPIAC (Greek).
ReverseInscription or printing placed on the reverse.: HPWΔOY TETPAPXO (Greek).
Mint and issuing power
MintIdentifies the place of manufacture or issue of a numismatic object.: Tiberias Ancient regionAncient region.: Galilee Modern countryModern country: Israel AuthorityIdentifies the issuing power. The authority can be "pretended" when the name or the portrait of X is on the coin but he/she was not the issuing power. It can also be "uncertain" when there is no mention of X on the coin but he/she was the issuing power according to the historical sources: Herod Antipas (tetrarch of Galilee and Perea, 4 BC-39 AD), Tiberius (Roman emperor, 14-37 AD)
Chronology
FromIdentifies the initial date in a range assigned in a numismatic context. 20 CE toIdentifies the final date in a range assigned in a numismatic context.. 21 CE PeriodTime period of the numismatic object.: Roman from 30 BC Nomisma.org
Physical description
MetalThe physical material (usually metal) from which an object is made.: Bronze Nomisma.org DenominationTerm indicating the value of a numismatic object. Examples: tetradrachm, chalkous, denarius.: dupondius Nomisma.org StandardStandard.:
References
Die study referencePublication of the study: "[[Die study reference" contains a listed "[" character as part of the property label and has therefore been classified as invalid.]]1A. J. Kogon et Ph. Fontanille, The Coinage of Herod Antipas: A Study and Die Classification of the Earliest Coins of Galilee, Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity 102). Foreword by C. Lorber, Leiden-Boston, 2018 (série B, type n° 2, dénomination I).
Coin series referenceReference to coin series study:



Obverse dies distribution
FrequencyFrequency of specimen in distribution. ᵖ Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) % (o) Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) % (n) Die nameName(s) of the die(s).
2 1 33.33 2 12.5
5 1 33.33 5 31.25
9 1 33.33 9 56.25
Total 3 of 3 99.99 16 of 16 100
Reverse dies distribution

no distribution is available

Quantification
Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) 3 Number of singletons (o1)The number of singleton coins. ᵖ
Number of reverse diesNumber of reverse dies. (r) 9 Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) 16
Coins per obverse dieNumber of coins per obverse die. (n/o) 5.33 Coins per reverse dieNumber of coins per reverse die. (n/r) 1.78
Reverse per obverse ratioRatio of obverse dies divided by reverse dies. (r/o) 3 Percentage of singletons (o1)number of coins (n) divided by the number of singletons (o1) ᵖ %
Original number of dies (O) (Carter 1983 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to Carter 1983 ᵖ 3.29 Coins struck if 20,000 as average productivity per dieCoins made if the average productivity for obverses (according to Carter) is 20,000. ᵖ 65,800
Original number of dies (O) (Esty 2011 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to the singleton formula in Esty 2011 ᵖ (O) 3.69 Survival rate if 20,000 as average productivity per dieSurvival rate if average productivity is 20,000. ᵖ 0.00024
Coverage (o = % of O) (Esty 1984 formula)Esty 1984 - coverage (% of O) ᵖ (o = % of O) % Die productivity if survival rate 1/2,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/2,000. ᵖ 9,726.44
Weight of silver (in kg) if 20,000 coins per die (O = Carter formula)Carter 1983 * Median weight * 20000 (*10 if gold or electrum) ᵖ n.a. Die productivity if survival rate 1/5,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/5,000. ᵖ 24,316.11
Remarks


References

  1. ^ A. J. Kogon et Ph. Fontanille