S 345 - Miletus, silver, hemidrachm, 170-150 BC

From SILVER
SILVER IDUnique ID of the page ᵖ: 9284


170 BCE - 150 BCE Silver 975 kg

Description
ObverseInscription or printing placed on the obverse.: Head of Apollo right, wearing laurel wreath.
ReverseInscription or printing placed on the reverse.: monogram of the city (Greek).Lion right, head reverted, above, a star. In the field, name and monogram.
Mint and issuing power
MintIdentifies the place of manufacture or issue of a numismatic object.: Miletus Ancient regionAncient region.: Ionia Modern countryModern country: Turkey AuthorityIdentifies the issuing power. The authority can be "pretended" when the name or the portrait of X is on the coin but he/she was not the issuing power. It can also be "uncertain" when there is no mention of X on the coin but he/she was the issuing power according to the historical sources:
Chronology
FromIdentifies the initial date in a range assigned in a numismatic context. 170 BCE toIdentifies the final date in a range assigned in a numismatic context.. 150 BCE PeriodTime period of the numismatic object.: Hellenistic 323-30 BC Nomisma.org
Physical description
MetalThe physical material (usually metal) from which an object is made.: Silver Nomisma.org Median weightMedian of the weights of numismatic objects (in grams). in grams 2.40 DenominationTerm indicating the value of a numismatic object. Examples: tetradrachm, chalkous, denarius.: hemidrachm Nomisma.org StandardStandard.:
Image
]]S_345_-_Miletus,_silver,_hemidrachm,_170-150_BC.jpg [1]
References
Die study referencePublication of the study: "[[Die study reference" contains a listed "[" character as part of the property label and has therefore been classified as invalid.]]1Kinns 1998, p. 175-195, pl. 38-46 (catalog p. 183-195, hemidrachma of the phase II).
Coin series referenceReference to coin series study:



Obverse dies distribution
FrequencyFrequency of specimen in distribution. ᵖ Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) % (o) Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) % (n) Die nameName(s) of the die(s).
4 1 5.56 4 4.82 O18
7 1 5.56 7 8.43 O16
29 1 5.56 29 34.94 O22
1 8 44.44 8 9.64 O17, O19, O20, O24, O33, O37, O48, O45A
2 2 11.11 4 4.82 O21, O51
3 2 11.11 6 7.23 O25, O36
8 2 11.11 16 19.28 O23, O26
9 1 5.56 9 10.84 O23, O26
Total 18 of 18 100.01 83 of 83 100
Reverse dies distribution

no distribution is available

Quantification
Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) 18 Number of singletons (o1)The number of singleton coins. ᵖ 8
Number of reverse diesNumber of reverse dies. (r) 34 Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) 83
Coins per obverse dieNumber of coins per obverse die. (n/o) 4.61 Coins per reverse dieNumber of coins per reverse die. (n/r) 2.44
Reverse per obverse ratioRatio of obverse dies divided by reverse dies. (r/o) 1.89 Percentage of singletons (o1)number of coins (n) divided by the number of singletons (o1) ᵖ 44.44 %
Original number of dies (O) (Carter 1983 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to Carter 1983 ᵖ 20.31 Coins struck if 20,000 as average productivity per dieCoins made if the average productivity for obverses (according to Carter) is 20,000. ᵖ 406,200
Original number of dies (O) (Esty 2011 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to the singleton formula in Esty 2011 ᵖ (O) 22.98 Survival rate if 20,000 as average productivity per dieSurvival rate if average productivity is 20,000. ᵖ 0.00020
Coverage (o = % of O) (Esty 1984 formula)Esty 1984 - coverage (% of O) ᵖ (o = % of O) 90.36% Die productivity if survival rate 1/2,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/2,000. ᵖ 8,173.31
Weight of silver (in kg) if 20,000 coins per die (O = Carter formula)Carter 1983 * Median weight * 20000 (*10 if gold or electrum) ᵖ 975 kg <br /> 975 kg Die productivity if survival rate 1/5,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/5,000. ᵖ 20,433.28
Remarks


References

  1. ^  Kinns, Philip (1998), "CH 8, 474: Milesian Silver Coinage in the Second Century BC", in Richard Ashton and Silvia Hurter (eds.), Studies in Greek Numismatics in Memory of Martin Jessop Price, London, p. 175-195, pl. 38-46.