S 1819 - Acanthus, silver, tritetartemoria (Period E) (460-430 BCE)

From SILVER
SILVER IDUnique ID of the page ᵖ: 12806


460 BCE - 430 BCE Silver 192 kg

Description
ObverseInscription or printing placed on the obverse.: Head of bull right
ReverseInscription or printing placed on the reverse.: Quadripartite incuse square
Mint and issuing power
MintIdentifies the place of manufacture or issue of a numismatic object.: Acanthus Ancient regionAncient region.: Macedon Modern countryModern country: Greece AuthorityIdentifies the issuing power. The authority can be "pretended" when the name or the portrait of X is on the coin but he/she was not the issuing power. It can also be "uncertain" when there is no mention of X on the coin but he/she was the issuing power according to the historical sources:
Chronology
FromIdentifies the initial date in a range assigned in a numismatic context. 460 BCE toIdentifies the final date in a range assigned in a numismatic context.. 430 BCE PeriodTime period of the numismatic object.: Classical 480-323 BC Nomisma.org
Physical description
MetalThe physical material (usually metal) from which an object is made.: Silver Nomisma.org Median weightMedian of the weights of numismatic objects (in grams). in grams 0.50 DenominationTerm indicating the value of a numismatic object. Examples: tetradrachm, chalkous, denarius.: tritetartemorion StandardStandard.:
Image
]]S1819 Acanthus obols E.jpg [1]
References
Die study referencePublication of the study: "[[Die study reference" contains a listed "[" character as part of the property label and has therefore been classified as invalid.]]1Tselekas 1996, p. 264-265
Coin series referenceReference to coin series study:



Obverse dies distribution
FrequencyFrequency of specimen in distribution. ᵖ Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) % (o) Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) % (n) Die nameName(s) of the die(s).
1 8 57.14 8 22.22 84, 85, 86, 88, 89, 91, 92, 94
2 2 14.29 4 11.11 87, 95
4 3 21.43 12 33.33 90, 93, 97
12 1 7.14 12 33.33 96
Total 14 of 14 100 36 of 36 99.99
Reverse dies distribution

no distribution is available

Quantification
Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) 14 Number of singletons (o1)The number of singleton coins. ᵖ 8
Number of reverse diesNumber of reverse dies. (r) 15 Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) 36
Coins per obverse dieNumber of coins per obverse die. (n/o) 2.57 Coins per reverse dieNumber of coins per reverse die. (n/r) 2.4
Reverse per obverse ratioRatio of obverse dies divided by reverse dies. (r/o) 1.07 Percentage of singletons (o1)number of coins (n) divided by the number of singletons (o1) ᵖ 57.14 %
Original number of dies (O) (Carter 1983 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to Carter 1983 ᵖ 19.21 Coins struck if 20,000 as average productivity per dieCoins made if the average productivity for obverses (according to Carter) is 20,000. ᵖ 384,200
Original number of dies (O) (Esty 2011 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to the singleton formula in Esty 2011 ᵖ (O) 22.91 Survival rate if 20,000 as average productivity per dieSurvival rate if average productivity is 20,000. ᵖ 0.00009
Coverage (o = % of O) (Esty 1984 formula)Esty 1984 - coverage (% of O) ᵖ (o = % of O) 77.78% Die productivity if survival rate 1/2,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/2,000. ᵖ 3,748.05
Weight of silver (in kg) if 20,000 coins per die (O = Carter formula)Carter 1983 * Median weight * 20000 (*10 if gold or electrum) ᵖ 192 kg <br /> 192 kg Die productivity if survival rate 1/5,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/5,000. ᵖ 9,370.12
Remarks

Most likely one single workstation

References

  1. ^  Tselekas, Panagiotis (1996), The Coinage of Acanthus, Oxford, St Cross College, DPhil, 350 p., 7 maps, 53 pl.