Iasus, bronze (8g) (Apollo & Artemis/boy holding a dolphin) (200-140 BCE)
From SILVER
200 BCE - 140 BCE Bronze
Description
| ObverseInscription or printing placed on the obverse.: | Heads of Apollo and Artemis right. |
| ReverseInscription or printing placed on the reverse.: | IAΣEΩΝ (Greek).Male charakter holding a dolphin swimming right. (In the field, magistrate name and/or a star or a monogram). |
Mint and issuing power
| MintIdentifies the place of manufacture or issue of a numismatic object.: | Iasus | Ancient regionAncient region.: | Caria | Modern countryModern country: Turkey | AuthorityIdentifies the issuing power. The authority can be "pretended" when the name or the portrait of X is on the coin but he/she was not the issuing power. It can also be "uncertain" when there is no mention of X on the coin but he/she was the issuing power according to the historical sources: |
Chronology
| FromIdentifies the initial date in a range assigned in a numismatic context. | 200 BCE | toIdentifies the final date in a range assigned in a numismatic context.. | 140 BCE | PeriodTime period of the numismatic object.: Hellenistic 323-30 BC 
|
Physical description
| MetalThe physical material (usually metal) from which an object is made.: | Bronze
|
Median weightMedian of the weights of numismatic objects (in grams). in grams | 8.00 | DenominationTerm indicating the value of a numismatic object. Examples: tetradrachm, chalkous, denarius.: | hemiobol
|
StandardStandard.: |
Image
Iasus_bronze_Apollo_&_Artemis_boy_and_dolphin.jpg [1]
References
| Die study referencePublication of the study: | Ashton 20071Ashton 2007, p. 47-78 (catalogue p. 69-71). | ||
| Coin series referenceReference to coin series study: | |||
| Coin series web referenceCoin series web references: | |||
Obverse dies distribution
| FrequencyFrequency of specimen in distribution. ᵖ | Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) | % (o) | Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) | % (n) | Die nameName(s) of the die(s). |
| 1 | 10 | 55.56 | 10 | 22.22 | 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.6, 1.7, 2.A, 3.2, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3 |
| 2 | 3 | 16.67 | 6 | 13.33 | 1.5, 7.1, 7.2 |
| 3 | 1 | 5.56 | 3 | 6.67 | 3.1 |
| 4 | 2 | 11.11 | 8 | 17.78 | 4.2, 6.1 |
| 6 | 1 | 5.56 | 6 | 13.33 | 4.1 |
| 10 | 1 | 5.56 | 10 | 22.22 | 1.2 |
| Total | 18 of 18 | 100.02 | 43 of 45 | 95.55 |
Reverse dies distribution
no distribution is available
Quantification
| Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) | 18 | Number of singletons (o1)The number of singleton coins. ᵖ | 10 |
| Number of reverse diesNumber of reverse dies. (r) | 34 | Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) | 45 |
| Coins per obverse dieNumber of coins per obverse die. (n/o) | 2.5 | Coins per reverse dieNumber of coins per reverse die. (n/r) | 1.32 |
| Reverse per obverse ratioRatio of obverse dies divided by reverse dies. (r/o) | 1.89 | Percentage of singletons (o1)number of coins (n) divided by the number of singletons (o1) ᵖ | 55.56 % |
| Original number of dies (O) (Carter 1983 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to Carter 1983 ᵖ | 25.08 | Coins struck if 20,000 as average productivity per dieCoins made if the average productivity for obverses (according to Carter) is 20,000. ᵖ | 501,600 |
| Original number of dies (O) (Esty 2011 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to the singleton formula in Esty 2011 ᵖ (O) | 30 | Survival rate if 20,000 as average productivity per dieSurvival rate if average productivity is 20,000. ᵖ | 0.00009 |
| Coverage (o = % of O) (Esty 1984 formula)Esty 1984 - coverage (% of O) ᵖ (o = % of O) | 77.78% | Die productivity if survival rate 1/2,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/2,000. ᵖ | 3,588.52 |
| Weight of silver (in kg) if 20,000 coins per die (O = Carter formula)Carter 1983 * Median weight * 20000 (*10 if gold or electrum) ᵖ | n.a. | Die productivity if survival rate 1/5,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/5,000. ᵖ | 8,971.29 |
Remarks
Most likely one single workstation
References
- ^ Ashton, Richard (2007), "The pre-Imperial Coinage of Iasos", Numismatic Chronicle, 167, p. 47-78
