H 91 - Cabyle (Skostokos), bronzes (head/horseman) (260-245 BCE)
From SILVER
260 BCE - 245 BCE Bronze
Description
| ObverseInscription or printing placed on the obverse.: | Bareheaded and draped bust right. |
| ReverseInscription or printing placed on the reverse.: | ΣKOΣTOKOY (Greek).Horseman galloping right, holding baton. |
Mint and issuing power
| MintIdentifies the place of manufacture or issue of a numismatic object.: | Cabyle | Ancient regionAncient region.: | Thrace | Modern countryModern country: Bulgaria | AuthorityIdentifies the issuing power. The authority can be "pretended" when the name or the portrait of X is on the coin but he/she was not the issuing power. It can also be "uncertain" when there is no mention of X on the coin but he/she was the issuing power according to the historical sources: | Skostokos (vassal of Lysimachus or ruler in Thrace ?) |
Chronology
| FromIdentifies the initial date in a range assigned in a numismatic context. | 260 BCE | toIdentifies the final date in a range assigned in a numismatic context.. | 245 BCE | PeriodTime period of the numismatic object.: Hellenistic 323-30 BC 
|
Physical description
| MetalThe physical material (usually metal) from which an object is made.: | Bronze
|
Median weightMedian of the weights of numismatic objects (in grams). in grams | 4.30 | DenominationTerm indicating the value of a numismatic object. Examples: tetradrachm, chalkous, denarius.: | StandardStandard.: |
Image
RQEMH 91 - Cabyle, bronze, NC, 260-55-245 BC.jpg [1]
References
| Die study referencePublication of the study: | Draganov 19931Draganov 1993, n° 27.1-75.49. | ||
| Coin series referenceReference to coin series study: | RQEMH2RQEMH, n° 91 | ||
Obverse dies distribution
| FrequencyFrequency of specimen in distribution. ᵖ | Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) | % (o) | Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) | % (n) | Die nameName(s) of the die(s). |
| 1 | 1 | 16.67 | 1 | 2.22 | 5 |
| 4 | 1 | 16.67 | 4 | 8.89 | 3 |
| 6 | 1 | 16.67 | 6 | 13.33 | 2 |
| 9 | 1 | 16.67 | 9 | 20 | 4 |
| 12 | 1 | 16.67 | 12 | 26.67 | 6 |
| 13 | 1 | 16.67 | 13 | 28.89 | 1 |
| Total | 6 of 6 | 100.02 | 45 of 45 | 100 |
Reverse dies distribution
no distribution is available
Quantification
| Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) | 6 | Number of singletons (o1)The number of singleton coins. ᵖ | 1 |
| Number of reverse diesNumber of reverse dies. (r) | 8 | Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) | 45 |
| Coins per obverse dieNumber of coins per obverse die. (n/o) | 7.5 | Coins per reverse dieNumber of coins per reverse die. (n/r) | 5.63 |
| Reverse per obverse ratioRatio of obverse dies divided by reverse dies. (r/o) | 1.33 | Percentage of singletons (o1)number of coins (n) divided by the number of singletons (o1) ᵖ | 16.67 % |
| Original number of dies (O) (Carter 1983 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to Carter 1983 ᵖ | 6.27 | Coins struck if 20,000 as average productivity per dieCoins made if the average productivity for obverses (according to Carter) is 20,000. ᵖ | 125,400 |
| Original number of dies (O) (Esty 2011 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to the singleton formula in Esty 2011 ᵖ (O) | 6.92 | Survival rate if 20,000 as average productivity per dieSurvival rate if average productivity is 20,000. ᵖ | 0.00036 |
| Coverage (o = % of O) (Esty 1984 formula)Esty 1984 - coverage (% of O) ᵖ (o = % of O) | 97.78% | Die productivity if survival rate 1/2,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/2,000. ᵖ | 14,354.07 |
| Weight of silver (in kg) if 20,000 coins per die (O = Carter formula)Carter 1983 * Median weight * 20000 (*10 if gold or electrum) ᵖ | n.a. | Die productivity if survival rate 1/5,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/5,000. ᵖ | 35,885.17 |
Remarks
Most likely one single workstation
