H 130 - Uncertain mint, silver, tetradrachm, 292-290 BC
From SILVER
292 - 290 Silver 0 kg
Description
| ObverseInscription or printing placed on the obverse.: | Diademed and horned head of Demetrios I right. |
| ReverseInscription or printing placed on the reverse.: | ΒΑΣΙΛEΩΣ ΔHMΗΤΡΙΟΥ (Greek). |
Mint and issuing power
| MintIdentifies the place of manufacture or issue of a numismatic object.: | Ancient regionAncient region.: | Modern countryModern country: | AuthorityIdentifies the issuing power. The authority can be "pretended" when the name or the portrait of X is on the coin but he/she was not the issuing power. It can also be "uncertain" when there is no mention of X on the coin but he/she was the issuing power according to the historical sources: | Demetrius I Poliorcetes (Antigonid king, 294-283 BC) |
Chronology
| FromIdentifies the initial date in a range assigned in a numismatic context. | 292 | toIdentifies the final date in a range assigned in a numismatic context.. | 290 | PeriodTime period of the numismatic object.: Hellenistic 323-30 BC 
|
Physical description
| MetalThe physical material (usually metal) from which an object is made.: | Silver
|
DenominationTerm indicating the value of a numismatic object. Examples: tetradrachm, chalkous, denarius.: | tetradrachm
|
StandardStandard.: | |
| Mode weightMode of the weights of numismatic objects (in grams).: | 16,80-99<ul><li>No units of measurement were declared for this property.</li> <!--br--><li>",80-99" is not declared as a valid unit of measurement for this property.</li></ul> |
References
| Die study referencePublication of the study: | Newell 1927.1Newell 1927. | ||
| Coin series referenceReference to coin series study: | RQEMH2RQEMH, n° 130 | ||
Obverse dies distribution
| FrequencyFrequency of specimen in distribution. ᵖ | Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) | % (o) | Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) | % (n) | Die nameName(s) of the die(s). |
| 1 | 4 | 33.33 | 4 | 9.3 | 64, 93, 95, 134 |
| 2 | 3 | 25 | 6 | 13.95 | 90, 132, 133 |
| 3 | 1 | 8.33 | 3 | 6.98 | 96 |
| 4 | 1 | 8.33 | 4 | 9.3 | 94 |
| 5 | 1 | 8.33 | 5 | 11.63 | 91 |
| 9 | 1 | 8.33 | 9 | 20.93 | 92 |
| 12 | 1 | 8.33 | 12 | 27.91 | 63 |
| Total | 12 of 12 | 99.98 | 43 of 43 | 100 |
Reverse dies distribution
no distribution is available
Quantification
| Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) | 12 | Number of singletons (o1)The number of singleton coins. ᵖ | 4 |
| Number of reverse diesNumber of reverse dies. (r) | 26 | Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) | 43 |
| Coins per obverse dieNumber of coins per obverse die. (n/o) | 3.58 | Coins per reverse dieNumber of coins per reverse die. (n/r) | 1.65 |
| Reverse per obverse ratioRatio of obverse dies divided by reverse dies. (r/o) | 2.17 | Percentage of singletons (o1)number of coins (n) divided by the number of singletons (o1) ᵖ | 33.33 % |
| Original number of dies (O) (Carter 1983 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to Carter 1983 ᵖ | 14.39 | Coins struck if 20,000 as average productivity per dieCoins made if the average productivity for obverses (according to Carter) is 20,000. ᵖ | 287,800 |
| Original number of dies (O) (Esty 2011 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to the singleton formula in Esty 2011 ᵖ (O) | 16.65 | Survival rate if 20,000 as average productivity per dieSurvival rate if average productivity is 20,000. ᵖ | 0.00015 |
| Coverage (o = % of O) (Esty 1984 formula)Esty 1984 - coverage (% of O) ᵖ (o = % of O) | 90.7% | Die productivity if survival rate 1/2,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/2,000. ᵖ | 5,976.37 |
| Weight of silver (in kg) if 20,000 coins per die (O = Carter formula)Carter 1983 * Median weight * 20000 (*10 if gold or electrum) ᵖ | 0 kg <br /> 0 kg | Die productivity if survival rate 1/5,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/5,000. ᵖ | 14,940.93 |
Remarks
Most likely one single workstation
