H 129 - Uncertain mint, silver, tetradrachm, 301-292 BC
From SILVER
301 - 292 Silver 0 kg
Description
ObverseInscription or printing placed on the obverse.: | Nike standing left on prow left, blowing trumpet and holding stylus. |
ReverseInscription or printing placed on the reverse.: | ΒΑΣΙΛEΩΣ ΔHMΗΤΡΙΟΥ (Greek).Poseidon advancing left, with chlamys on left arm, brandishing trident, in left field, monogram, in right field, star. |
Mint and issuing power
MintIdentifies the place of manufacture or issue of a numismatic object.: | Ancient regionAncient region.: | Modern countryModern country: | AuthorityIdentifies the issuing power. The authority can be "pretended" when the name or the portrait of X is on the coin but he/she was not the issuing power. It can also be "uncertain" when there is no mention of X on the coin but he/she was the issuing power according to the historical sources: | Demetrius I Poliorcetes (Antigonid king, 294-283 BC) |
Chronology
FromIdentifies the initial date in a range assigned in a numismatic context. | 301 | toIdentifies the final date in a range assigned in a numismatic context.. | 292 | PeriodTime period of the numismatic object.: Hellenistic 323-30 BC |
Physical description
MetalThe physical material (usually metal) from which an object is made.: | Silver | DenominationTerm indicating the value of a numismatic object. Examples: tetradrachm, chalkous, denarius.: | tetradrachm | StandardStandard.: | |
Mode weightMode of the weights of numismatic objects (in grams).: | 16,80-17,09<ul><li>No units of measurement were declared for this property.</li> <!--br--><li>",80-17,09" is not declared as a valid unit of measurement for this property.</li></ul> |
References
Die study referencePublication of the study: | Newell 19271 | ||
Coin series referenceReference to coin series study: | RQEMH2 |
Obverse dies distribution
FrequencyFrequency of specimen in distribution. ᵖ | Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) | % (o) | Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) | % (n) | Die nameName(s) of the die(s). |
1 | 24 | 48 | 24 | 22.22 | 13, 14, 16, 17, 23, 24, 25, 32, 39, 40, 44, 45, 46, 47, 49, 52, 53, 58, 59, 60, 61, 86, 87, 88 |
2 | 11 | 22 | 22 | 20.37 | 22, 28, 31, 41, 42, 43, 48, 62, 84, 85, 89 |
3 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 19.44 | 11, 12, 27, 29, 37, 50, 51 |
4 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 14.81 | 20, 21, 26, 30 |
5 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 9.26 | 15, 19 |
7 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 6.48 | 18 |
8 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 7.41 | 57 |
Total | 50 of 50 | 100 | 108 of 108 | 99.99 |
Reverse dies distribution
no distribution is available
Quantification
Number of obversesNumber of obverse dies. ᵖ (o) | 50 | Number of singletons (o1)The number of singleton coins. ᵖ | 24 |
Number of reverse diesNumber of reverse dies. (r) | 89 | Number of coinsNumber of coins. (n) | 108 |
Coins per obverse dieNumber of coins per obverse die. (n/o) | 2.16 | Coins per reverse dieNumber of coins per reverse die. (n/r) | 1.21 |
Reverse per obverse ratioRatio of obverse dies divided by reverse dies. (r/o) | 1.78 | Percentage of singletons (o1)number of coins (n) divided by the number of singletons (o1) ᵖ | 48 % |
Original number of dies (O) (Carter 1983 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to Carter 1983 ᵖ | 76.5 | Coins struck if 20,000 as average productivity per dieCoins made if the average productivity for obverses (according to Carter) is 20,000. ᵖ | 1,530,000 |
Original number of dies (O) (Esty 2011 formula)The estimation of the number of coins according to the singleton formula in Esty 2011 ᵖ (O) | 93.1 | Survival rate if 20,000 as average productivity per dieSurvival rate if average productivity is 20,000. ᵖ | 0.00007 |
Coverage (o = % of O) (Esty 1984 formula)Esty 1984 - coverage (% of O) ᵖ (o = % of O) | 77.78% | Die productivity if survival rate 1/2,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/2,000. ᵖ | 2,823.53 |
Weight of silver (in kg) if 20,000 coins per die (O = Carter formula)Carter 1983 * Median weight * 20000 (*10 if gold or electrum) ᵖ | 0 kg <br /> 0 kg | Die productivity if survival rate 1/5,000Average productivity if survival rate is 1/5,000. ᵖ | 7,058.82 |
Remarks
Most likely one single workstation